|
Big
award over failed hospital a partial win
Managers
regret Calexico’s loss
By Greg
Moran
STAFF
WRITER
June 5,
2006
For
almost 47 years, little Calexico Hospital was the only significant
medical facility for the inhabitants of this sizzling border town, a
34-bed facility that residents cherished and depended upon.
But in
the 1990s the hospital ran into a litany of problems – poor inspection
reports from state and federal regulators, ballooning debt and, finally,
a descent into bankruptcy.
The
words “troubled” and “Calexico Hospital” could usually be found in the
same sentence as more beds lay empty and tensions rose. So when the
hospital closed its doors in 1998, it seemed the predictable end to a
slow demise.
Eight
years later, in a small Imperial County courtroom, the reasons Calexico
Hospital shut down were debated in front of 12 jurors, some of whom had
been born at the very hospital whose last days they were now dissecting.
After
two months of trial, the jurors in March decided the cause of the
hospital’s death was not bankruptcy, mismanagement or the unforgiving
world of health care economics.
No, it
was a handful of state regulators, jurors decided, whose actions drove
the hospital’s last chance of survival – a plan by two businessmen to
run the hospital profitably – into defeat.
The jury
awarded the two men, Randy Smith and Jay Ash, $12 million in what is
believed to be the largest verdict ever rendered against the state
Department of Health Services or its employees, said Dan Lawton, the San
Diego lawyer who represented Smith and Ash.
It is
also the third-highest judgment ever rendered in Imperial County courts.
State
lawyers say they will appeal, but if the award is not reversed the state
will have to pay the full judgment and possibly an additional $5 million
in legal fees, Lawton said.
After
years of often-acrimonious litigation, Calexico Hospital remains closed.
Only an emergency care clinic, operated by Pioneers Memorial Healthcare
District, occupies a small portion of the building.
Smith, a
Palm Springs businessman, said he laments what the hospital could have
become under a business plan he contends could have worked.
“I never
saw a place with a greater need for services,” he said. “I thought we
could really do something out there.”
Deputy
Attorney General David Taglienti, who defended the health department
workers, disputes that analysis. Among many issues at the trial, he
contended that Smith and Ash were in over their heads and that the
hospital failed because of their own errors.
A
spokeswoman for the Department of Health Services, or DHS, referred all
comments to Taglienti. While the state and DHS were named in the
original suit, they were dropped before trial because of legal
immunities.
The
remaining defendants were current and former DHS employees – all but one
have left the department. Even so, the state has to pay damages for
employees who are found to violate the law in the course of their
duties.
The suit
turned on an intriguing legal theory.
Ash, who
owns a collections business in San Diego, and Smith sued under the
federal Civil Rights Act, claiming they were deprived of a “property
interest” without due process of law.
That
interest was Medicare and Medi-Cal reimbursement dollars – the lifeblood
of most hospitals. It constituted about 90 percent of Calexico’s monthly
revenues.
To
qualify for reimbursement, a hospital must be certified, which comes
after health officials conduct an extensive survey.
In
effect, Ash and Smith argued that state health officials did not want
the hospital to get certified. They contended that the state did a
survey in August 1997 – which the hospital failed when a machine was
turned on and caused a brief power outage – in an unfair way.
Then,
the two said, state health officials promised to do a second survey in
October 1997, but never did.
When the
second survey was not done, Ash and Smith – who had sunk almost $500,000
of their own money into the hospital but were tapped out and then had no
revenues coming in – had to close down.
Lawton
said his clients had a due process right to a fair survey, the key to
securing state and federal reimbursement money.
“This is
the only hospital in the state this ever happened to,” Lawton said. No
other facility had ever had to close because the state did not schedule
a Medicare/Medi-Cal survey, he argued.
Lawton
said state officials were weary of the hospital’s troubles, and wary of
its service area. He said the hospital is close to the border, drew
patients from Mexicali and served illegal immigrants – at a time when
concern over public services being provided to illegal immigrants was at
a high pitch.
Taglienti disputed that notion and said the hospital’s failings were its
own doing. “There was at no time any intention to discriminate in any
way,” he said. “It was the hospital’s failings to meet minimum state and
federal guidelines that caused the end result.”
Ash and
Smith had contracted in 1996 with the hospital’s owner, Heffernan
Memorial Hospital District, to run the facility. They were to receive 65
percent of the hospital’s gross revenue under a two-year deal. The
district had placed the hospital in bankruptcy protection a year earlier
and was ready to emerge from that but needed an operator.
In
August 1997, state health inspectors came out to do the survey. When the
power outage occurred, the hospital was closed for two days. When it
reopened, state inspectors had a long list of “deficiencies” that had to
be corrected.
Lawton
said those were corrected by October, when Ash and Smith were ready for
another survey. By then they had run through $1.7 million in operating
capital. Lawton said he told state officials that they needed the survey
done in three to four weeks and that state officials agreed to conduct
one.
But it
never happened.
Lawton
said the assistant deputy director of DHS, Carla Framiglio, testified
later that it had already been determined by the state that the hospital
would close.
Taglienti said that was not so – that state officials, based on the poor
performance of the hospital, were prepared to tell the district to
voluntarily give up the license for a year or face disciplinary action.
In
December 1997, with funds running out, another meeting was held, Lawton
said. At this time, state officials dropped what he called a
“bombshell,” telling Ash and Smith that before a survey could even
begin, they needed Blue Cross insurance to review and approve yet
another lengthy form. The two could not get it done before their
dwindling funds ran out.
At the
trial, Lawton argued that the requirement for Blue Cross approval was a
pretext used to close the hospital. When it was shuttered, Ash and Smith
– who had put up houses and property as collateral to secure loans –
were left in the lurch, Lawton said.
The
jurors agreed. In their verdict, they concluded that not only had the
state officials deprived the pair of due process, but had done so in a
way that “shocked the conscience.”
Closure
of the hospital is still a sore point in the city.
Ray
Felkin, a member of the hospital district board, said plans are under
way to open a medical center and potentially a new hospital down the
line to replace Calexico Hospital.
He said
he was surprised at the jury’s verdict and seemed to agree with the
state’s position. “It wasn’t really the government’s fault,” he said.
“It was the mismanagement of the hospital.”
Ash said
the verdict was vindication.
“It’s
been a living nightmare since we got involved in it,” he said. “The
jurors just thought the state handled the whole thing miserably.”
Greg
Moran: (619) 542-4586; greg.moran@uniontrib.com
Back to In
The News
|